Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 22
Filter
1.
J. appl. oral sci ; 26: e20160590, 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-893721

ABSTRACT

Abstract The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the reliability of two measurement systems for evaluating the marginal and internal fit of dental copings. Material and Methods: Sixteen CAD/CAM titanium copings were produced for a prepared maxillary canine. To modify the CAD surface model using different parameters (data density; enlargement in different directions), varying fit was created. Five light-body silicone replicas representing the gap between the canine and the coping were made for each coping and for each measurement method: (1) light microscopy measurements (LMMs); and (2) computer-assisted measurements (CASMs) using an optical digitizing system. Two investigators independently measured the marginal and internal fit using both methods. The inter-rater reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)] and agreement [Bland-Altman (bias) analyses]: mean of the differences (bias) between two measurements [the closer to zero the mean (bias) is, the higher the agreement between the two measurements] were calculated for several measurement points (marginal-distal, marginal-buccal, axial-buccal, incisal). For the LMM technique, one investigator repeated the measurements to determine repeatability (intra-rater reliability and agreement). Results: For inter-rater reliability, the ICC was 0.848-0.998 for LMMs and 0.945-0.999 for CASMs, depending on the measurement point. Bland-Altman bias was −15.7 to 3.5 μm for LMMs and −3.0 to 1.9 μm for CASMs. For LMMs, the marginal-distal and marginal-buccal measurement points showed the lowest ICC (0.848/0.978) and the highest bias (-15.7 μm/-7.6 μm). With the intra-rater reliability and agreement (repeatability) for LMMs, the ICC was 0.970-0.998 and bias was −1.3 to 2.3 μm. Conclusion: LMMs showed lower interrater reliability and agreement at the marginal measurement points than CASMs, which indicates a more subjective influence with LMMs at these measurement points. The values, however, were still clinically acceptable. LMMs showed very high intra-rater reliability and agreement for all measurement points, indicating high repeatability.


Subject(s)
Replica Techniques/methods , Dental Prosthesis Design/methods , Computer-Aided Design , Dental Marginal Adaptation/standards , Models, Dental/standards , Microscopy/methods , Reference Standards , Reference Values , Titanium/chemistry , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results
2.
Rev. Salusvita (Online) ; 35(3): 423-435, 2016. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-833016

ABSTRACT

Introdução: a Prótese Parcial Removível (PPR) é por vezes negligenciada por profissionais quanto a sua confecção clínica e laboratorial e transferência de responsabilidades do cirurgião-dentista ao técnico de prótese dentária. Objetivo: este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a qualidade de planejamentos e preparos em modelos de trabalho enviados, por acadêmicos e Cirurgiões-Dentistas, à laboratórios de prótese dentária para confecção de PPRs. Método: a pesquisa foi realizada em 8 laboratórios de prótese dentária cadastrados no Conselho Regional de Odontologia do Piauí (CRO-PI), onde foram aplicados formulários com 10 questões fechadas. A amostra foi composta por 60 modelos para confecção de PPR, 30 encaminhados por dentistas e 30 por estudantes. Resultados: os resultados de mostraram que 21 (35%) dentistas utilizaram o gesso pedra para vazar os moldes e 21 (35%) estudantes, o gesso especial; 27 (45%) acadêmicos realizaram os preparos nos modelos, e 24 (40%) dentistas não prepararam os modelos; 2 (3,3%) técnicos receberam desenhos de dentistas e 26 (43,3%) estudantes enviaram os desenhos; 20 (33,3%) modelos de estudantes chegaram delineados e 29 (48,3%) modelos de dentistas foram delineados pelos técnicos; 26 (43,3%) técnicos não tiveram dúvidas nos planejamentos enviados por estudantes e 15 (25%) técnicos tiveram dúvidas nos trabalhos encaminhados por dentistas e 100% comunicou-se para esclarecimentos. Conclusão: concluiu-se que uma parcela considerável de Cirurgiões-Dentistas negligenciam as etapas de preparos de boca e planejamento das PPRs, delegando ao técnico em prótese dentária a maior responsabilidade no planejamento e execução das próteses.


Introduction: the Removable Partial Denture (RPD) is often neglected by professionals regarding their clinical and laboratory preparation and the transference of the responsibility from the dentist to the dental technician. Objective: this study aimed to assess the quality of planning and preparation in removable partial denture casts performed by dental students and dentists sent to the dental laboratories. Methods: the survey was conducted in eight registered dental laboratories in the Regional Council of Dentistry of Piaui (CRO-PI), where the forms was applied, with 10 closed questions. The sample consisted of 60 models for making RPD, 30 referred by dentists and 30 students. Results: the results showed that 21 (35%) dentists used plaster stone for casting and 21 (35%) students were leaked with special plaster; 27 (45%) of the dental students performed preparation in the dental models, and 24 (40%) dentists not prepared models; 2 (3.3%) of the dental technicians received technical designs of dentists and 26 (43.3%) of students; 20 (33.3%) students models arrived designed and 29 (48.3%) of dentists were done by technicians; 26 (43.3%) technicians had no doubt on the planning submitted by students and 15 (25%) had technical issues on the work referred by dentists and 100% communicated for clarification. Conclusion: in conclusion, a considerable number of dentists neglect the steps of mouth preparations and planning of RPDs, delegating to the dental technician the major responsibility in designing and executing removable partial denture.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Dental Prosthesis Design/methods , Models, Dental/standards , Denture, Partial, Removable , Students, Dental , Surveys and Questionnaires , Practice Patterns, Dentists' , Dental Technicians , Dentists
3.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-139765

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The dual-arch impression technique is convenient in that it makes the required maxillary and mandibular impressions, as well as the inter-occlusal record in one procedure. The accuracy of inter-abutment distance in dies fabricated from dual-arch impression technique remains in question because there is little information available in the literature. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of inter-abutment distance in dies obtained from full arch dual-arch trays with those obtained from full arch stock metal trays. Results and Conclusion: The metal dual-arch trays showed better accuracy followed by the plastic dual-arch and stock dentulous trays, respectively, though statistically insignificant. The pouring sequence did not have any effect on the inter-abutment distance statistically, though pouring the non-working side of the dual-arch impression first showed better accuracy.


Subject(s)
Alloys , Bicuspid , Dental Abutments/standards , Dental Articulators , Dental Impression Materials/chemistry , Dental Impression Technique/instrumentation , Dental Impression Technique/standards , Models, Dental/standards , Dental Occlusion, Centric , Denture Design/standards , Denture, Partial, Fixed , Equipment Design , Humans , Jaw Relation Record/instrumentation , Jaw Relation Record/methods , Molar , Plastics , Polyvinyls/chemistry , Siloxanes/chemistry , Surface Properties
4.
RGO (Porto Alegre) ; 57(3): 273-279, jul.-set. 2009. tab, ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-527906

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Avaliar a qualidade dos modelos para a confecção de próteses parciais removíveis. Métodos: Foram analisados 140 modelos em cinco laboratórios de prótese dentária da cidade de Teresina, Piauí, registrados no Conselho Regional de Odontologia. Uma ficha foi aplicada, com 14 questões fechadas e os dados coletados foram submetidos à análise estatística utilizando-se o programa SPSS. Os modelos foram analisados à luz natural ou artificial e fotografados para fins de registro e ilustração. Resultados: Os resultados demonstraram que em 100% dos casos o material de moldagem utilizado foi o alginato, sendo 96,43% dos modelos vazados pelo cirurgião-dentista. Destes, 64,47% foram vazados em gesso pedra e 36,43% em gesso especial. De acordo com critérios como qualidade de superfície, reprodução de detalhes, presença de bolhas e/ou nódulos, reprodução adequada da área edentada, 78,57% dos modelos foram considerados inadequados. Os modelos foram, na sua maioria (96,43%), montados em articulador pelo técnico de prótese dentária, sendo que apenas um cirurgião-dentista encaminhou o registro para montagem dos modelos. O articulador tipo charneira foi utilizado em 97,14% das montagens. Em 94,29% dos casos o planejamento e desenho não foram executados pelo cirurgião-dentista e em 87,86% dos casos nenhuma evidência de preparo de boca foi encontrada. A comunicação entre o cirurgião-dentista e o técnico de prótese dentária foi, na sua maioria, feita por telefone, em 80% dos casos. Conclusão: Deste modo, constatou-se que a prótese parcial removível continua sendo negligenciada em relação à sua confecção clínica e laboratorial, através de uma transferência excessiva de responsabilidades do cirurgião-dentista ao técnico de prótese dentária e de uma comunicação ineficaz entre ambos.


Objective: To evaluate the quality of models for making removable partial dentures. Methods: In this Study, 140 models were analysed in 05 dental prosthesis laboratories in the city of Teresina, Piauí, Brazil, registered with the Conselho Regional de Odontologia. A form containing 14 closed questions was applied, and the data collected were submitted to statistical analysis using the SPSS program. The models were analysed under natural or artificial light and photographed for record and illustration purposes. Results: The results showed that in 100% of the cases the molding material used was alginate, and 93.43% of the models were poured by the dentist. Of these, 64.47% were poured in stone plaster and 36.43% in special plaster. According to criteria such as surface quality, reproduction of details, presence of bubbles and/or nodules, adequate reproduction of the edentulous area, 78.57% of the models were considered inadequate. The majority of the models (96.43%), were mounted in an articulator by the Dental Laboratory Technician, but only 1 dentist sent the record for mounting the models. The hinge type articulator was used in 97.14% of the mountings. In 94.29% of the cases, the planning and design were not executed by the dentist and in 87.86% of the cases no evidence of mouth preparation was found. In 80% of the cases, communication between the dentist and the Dental Laboratory Technician was done by telephone. Conclusion: Thus it was verified that the removable partial denture continues to be neglected as regards its clinical and laboratorial fabrication, through an excessive transfer of responsibilities from the dentist to the Dental Laboratory Technician and an inefficient communication between the two.


Subject(s)
Humans , Dental Technicians , Dentists , Models, Dental/standards , Dental Prosthesis Design/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Braz. oral res ; 22(4): 293-298, 2008. ilus, graf, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-502195

ABSTRACT

Several impression materials are available in the Brazilian marketplace to be used in oral rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of different impression materials used for fixed partial dentures following the manufacturers' instructions. A master model representing a partially edentulous mandibular right hemi-arch segment whose teeth were prepared to receive full crowns was used. Custom trays were prepared with auto-polymerizing acrylic resin and impressions were performed with a dental surveyor, standardizing the path of insertion and removal of the tray. Alginate and elastomeric materials were used and stone casts were obtained after the impressions. For the silicones, impression techniques were also compared. To determine the impression materials' accuracy, digital photographs of the master model and of the stone casts were taken and the discrepancies between them were measured. The data were subjected to analysis of variance and Duncan's complementary test. Polyether and addition silicone following the single-phase technique were statistically different from alginate, condensation silicone and addition silicone following the double-mix technique (p < .05), presenting smaller discrepancies. However, condensation silicone was similar (p > .05) to alginate and addition silicone following the double-mix technique, but different from polysulfide. The results led to the conclusion that different impression materials and techniques influenced the stone casts' accuracy in a way that polyether, polysulfide and addition silicone following the single-phase technique were more accurate than the other materials.


Subject(s)
Dental Casting Technique/instrumentation , Dental Impression Materials/standards , Dental Impression Technique/instrumentation , Models, Dental/standards , Denture, Partial, Fixed/standards , Silicones/standards , Analysis of Variance , Materials Testing , Sulfides/standards
7.
Rev. Fac. Odontol. Bauru ; 8(1/2): 23-9, jan.-jun. 2000. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-298437

ABSTRACT

Avaliou-se o reembasamento de moldes obtidos pela técnica de moldagem com resina acrílica gelada comparativamente à uma técnica convencional de moldagem com casquete preenchido com mercaptana. Foi utilizado um dispositivo metálico contendo um troquel para casquetes e um para moldagem. Os troquéis foram metalizados pela eletrodeposiçäo de íons prata no molde. A alteraçäo dimensional dos moldes foi mensurada em microscópio de profundidade, pela discrepância de alinhamento horizontal entre a borda oclusal de um anel de aço que simula uma coroa total e se adapta perfeitamente ao troquel padräo, e a face oclusal de cada troquel reproduzido. As médias das alteraçöes dimensionais e respectivos desvios-padräo, em micrômetros foram: A-) 678,8 (ñ59,2) para Duralay sem reembasamento, 379,9 (ñ72,9) para Duralay com reembasamento e 18,8 (ñ6,2) para o Permlastic. A resina acrílica sem reembasamento apresentou maior alteraçäo dimensional. Troquéis reproduzidos a partir dos moldes de mercaptana apresentaram-se dimensionalmente mais próximos do padräo. O reembasamento demonstrou proporcionar melhora significante na moldagem com a resina acrílica gelada


Subject(s)
In Vitro Techniques , Dental Impression Materials/chemistry , Dental Impression Technique/standards , Elastomers/classification , Elastomers/chemistry , Dental Materials/classification , Dental Materials/chemistry , Dental Impression Materials/classification , Models, Dental/classification , Models, Dental/standards , Acrylic Resins/classification , Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Dental Impression Technique/classification
10.
In. Ferreira, Flávio Vellini. Ortodontia: diagnóstico e planejamento clínico. Säo Paulo, Artes Médicas, 3 ed; 1999. p.141-57, ilus. (BR).
Monography in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-271651
11.
In. Ferreira, Flávio Vellini. Ortodontia: diagnóstico e planejamento clínico. Säo Paulo, Artes Médicas, 3 ed; 1999. p.159-69, ilus, tab. (BR).
Monography in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-271652
12.
In. Ferreira, Flávio Vellini. Ortodontia: diagnóstico e planejamento clínico. Säo Paulo, Artes Médicas, 3 ed; 1999. p.225-32, ilus, tab. (BR).
Monography in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-271655
13.
In. Ferreira, Flávio Vellini. Ortodontia: diagnóstico e planejamento clínico. Säo Paulo, Artes Médicas, 2 ed; 1998. p.143-57, ilus. (BR).
Monography in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-271504
14.
In. Ferreira, Flávio Vellini. Ortodontia: diagnóstico e planejamento clínico. Säo Paulo, Artes Médicas, 2 ed; 1998. p.161-9, ilus, tab. (BR).
Monography in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-271505
15.
In. Ferreira, Flávio Vellini. Ortodontia: diagnóstico e planejamento clínico. Säo Paulo, Artes Médicas, 2 ed; 1998. p.227-32, ilus, tab. (BR).
Monography in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-271508
16.
Rev. Soc. Odontol. La Plata ; 11(20): 20-4, 29-33, 1998. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-242337

ABSTRACT

La toma de impresiones al paciente totalmente desdentado tiene como objetivo registrar la anatomía de la cavidad bucal para reproducirla en escayola, y poder confeccionar las prótesis a su medida. Exponemos en este artículo los criterios recomendados para conseguir unas buenas impresiones. Aportamos pequeñas sugerencias que pueden facilitar al profesional la adquisición de la destreza necesaria para obtener unas impresiones correctas


Subject(s)
Humans , Middle Aged , Dental Impression Materials , Dental Impression Technique , Denture, Complete/standards , Alginates/chemistry , Calcium Sulfate/standards , Colloids/chemistry , Models, Dental/standards , Jaw, Edentulous/rehabilitation , Jaw/anatomy & histology , Silicones/chemistry , Zinc Acetate/chemistry
17.
Rev. ADM ; 54(3): 154-6, mayo-jun. 1997. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-242313

ABSTRACT

Se describe el caso clínico de la resolución de una mordida abierta anterior, diagnosticada por la elaboración de un montaje en articulador semiajustable bajo la técnica modificada del modelo seccionado de Kennedy, en donde se logró el acople de dientes anteriores y su participación en movimientos funcionales mandibulares, por medio de la colocación de cuatro restauraciones onlay en molares superiores posteriormente a la extracción de terceros molares mandibulares y maxilares erupcionados


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Inlays , Malocclusion/diagnosis , Malocclusion/therapy , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Dental Articulators , Models, Dental/standards , Tooth Extraction/methods , Gold Alloys/therapeutic use , Molar , Molar, Third/surgery , Jaw Relation Record/methods , Vertical Dimension
18.
Säo Paulo; s.n; 1996. 47 p. ilus, tab.
Thesis in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-192801

ABSTRACT

Neste trabalho, o autor procurou verificar, a posiçäo do modelo superior montado no articulador, com arco facial utilizando-se da técnica funcional, o desvio em relaçäo à linha mediana, segundo os planos: horizontal, sagital e frontal. A pesquisa foi realizada com base no atendimento prestado a 40 pacientes edentados totais, na Clínica de Prótese Total da Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade de Säo Paulo. Na aplicaçäo do arco facial os pontos de referência condilares foram marcados a 12mm do tragus sobre a linha tragus/canto do olho e o ponto anterior, no meio da distância entre asa do nariz/linha bi-pupilar. O articulador, bem como o arco facial empregados foram da marca T.T. Nas transferências do arco facial dos pacientes ao articulador näo houve nenhum tipo de compensaçäo através das réguas horizontais condilares para corrigir os posicionamentos dos modelos. A medida do possível desvio de posiçäo do modelo foi feita através de transferidor e paquímetro, considerando-se para isso os pontos e planos de referência. Os resultados obtidos foram: 1) Em relaçäo ao plano sagital os modelos apresentaram-se em três posiçöes, ascendente, horizontal e descendente. Nas duas primeiras posiçöes, ascendente e horizontal, as assimetrias foram maiores (42,5 por cento ascendentes e 12,5 por cento horizontais); na posiçäo descendente houve igualdade entre as posiçöes assimétrica e simétrica. 2) Em relaçäo ao plano frontal encontramos 30 por cento de simetria e 70 por cento de assimetria (32,5 por cento de desvio para a esquerda e 37,5 por cento de desvio para a direita). 3) Em relaçäo ao plano horizontal, encontramos 10 por cento de simetria e 90 por cento de assimetria (75 por cento de desvio para a esquerda e 15 por cento de desvio para a direita)


Subject(s)
Dental Articulators/standards , Dental Arch/anatomy & histology , Dental Arch/physiology , Models, Dental/standards , Facial Asymmetry/diagnosis , Facial Asymmetry/rehabilitation , Denture, Complete/standards , Xenarthra/physiology
20.
In. Ferreira, Flavio Vellini. Ortodontia: diagnóstico e planejamento clínico. Säo Paulo, Artes Médicas, 1996. p.161-9, ilus, tab.
Monography in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-168118
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL